Discussion of findings and dissertation

Discussion of findings and dissertation

III: Findings, Discussion, and Final Defense > > > Writing a Short Literature Review Topic 4: Literature Review. In this activity, you will read through a worked example of a short literature review. Before you begin to write your Literature Review for the dissertation, be sure to watch the video in this activity and read the supporting DISSERTATION CHAPTERS Order and format of dissertation chapters may vary by institution and department. 1. Introduction 2. Literature review 3. Methodology 4. Findings 5. Analysis and synthesis 6. Conclusions and recommendations Chapter 1: Introduction This chapter makes a case for the signifi-cance of the problem, contextualizes the Jun 27,  · The results section should aim to narrate the findings without trying to interpret or evaluate, and also provide a direction to the discussion section of the research paper. The results are reported and reveals the analysis. The analysis section is where the writer describes what was done with the data found. In order to write the analysis

12 Steps to Write an Effective Discussion Chapter | Dissertation Genius

ViewsThe discussion of findings and dissertation section of your manuscript can be one of the hardest to write as it requires you to think about the meaning of the research you have done. An effective discussion section tells the reader what your study means and why it is important. It should relate back directly to the questions posed in your introduction, and contextualize your results within the literature discussion of findings and dissertation have covered in your literature review.

In order to make your discussion section engaging, you should include the following information:. Related: Avoid outright rejection with a well-structured manuscript.

Check out these resources and improve your manuscript now! There are several ways to make the discussion section of your manuscript effective, interesting, and relevant. Our findings suggest that patients who had partially blocked arteries and were treated with a stent as the first line of intervention had no better outcomes than patients who were not given any surgical treatments.

Our findings noted that patients who received stents demonstrated slightly higher rates of asthma than those who did not. In addition, the placement of a stent did not impact their rates of cardiac events in a statistically significant way.

Many writers confuse the discussion of findings and dissertation they should include in their discussion with the information they should place in their conclusion. One easy way to avoid this confusion is to discussion of findings and dissertation of your conclusion as a summary of everything that you have said thus far.

In the conclusion section, you remind the reader of what they have just read. Your conclusion should:. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of stent placement.

We compared the patients with partially blocked arteries to those with non-surgical interventions. After examining the five-year medical outcomes of 19, patients in the Greater Dallas area, our statistical analysis concluded that the placement of a stent resulted in outcomes that were no better than non-surgical interventions such as diet and exercise.

Although previous findings indicated that stent placement improved patient outcomes, discussion of findings and dissertation, our study followed a greater number of patients than those in major studies conducted previously.

It is possible that outcomes would vary if measured over a ten or fifteen year period, discussion of findings and dissertation.

Future researchers should consider investigating the impact of stent placement in these patients over a longer period five years or longer. Regardless, our results point to the need for medical practitioners to reconsider the placement of a stent as the first line of treatment as non-surgical interventions may have equally positive outcomes for patients, discussion of findings and dissertation.

Did you find the tips in this article relevant? What is the most challenging portion of a research paper for you to write? Let us know in the comments section below! How to Draft the Acknowledgment Section of a Manuscript. Abstract vs. Introduction: Do You Know the Difference? Annex vs. Appendix: Do You Know the Difference? Will Changing the P-Value Fix Reproducibility in Science?

Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:. We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you. Discussion Vs. Conclusion: Know the Difference Before Drafting Manuscripts Manuscript sections.

Reading time 4 minutes. Manuscript sections. You might also like. Reporting Research. Prev Next. Show Comments

Thesis/Dissertation #5: Writing Your Results

, time: 6:43

Home - Research Paper Writing - WIU Libraries Guides at Western Illinois University

DO: Provide context and explain why people should care. DON'T: Simply rehash your results. Your discussion should begin with a cogent, one-paragraph summary of the study's key findings, but then go beyond that to put the findings into context, says Stephen Hinshaw, PhD, chair of the psychology department at the University of California, Berkeley Apr 14,  · The discussion section of the manuscript should come after the methods and results section and before the conclusion. It should relate back directly to the questions posed in your introduction, and contextualize your results within the literature you have covered in your literature review III: Findings, Discussion, and Final Defense > > > Writing a Short Literature Review Topic 4: Literature Review. In this activity, you will read through a worked example of a short literature review. Before you begin to write your Literature Review for the dissertation, be sure to watch the video in this activity and read the supporting